Try as I might, I simply cannot find teaching room for the new Spec IGCSE in English Language and English Literature within yrs 10 & 11. I take it as read that my students will read the whole of the texts designated as coursework, as though they were engaged in the examinations. With this in mind, the addition of an extra play in the drama section really does mean a year 9 start. And so it is that I am engaged with Of Mice and Men, not as a class reader but as a future exam text. This is tricky given that the whole thing is still in draft form. Still, what ho!
Welcome back to IGCSE – the area that still offers OMAM and TKAM, should you wish to teach them!
So what else does the new Spec have to offer those of us still teaching it?
Paper 1 is still focused around the anthology, but there are significant changes for the better. The current paper is worth 70% of the whole and the time spent teaching Anthology A is rewarded with a short analysis question worth a mere 10 marks and taking around 20 minutes to complete. Hardly value for the teaching-time. In the new paper there are sensible alterations: the weighting is now 60% and the Anthology is now central to the paper, being paired with an unseen non-fiction passage for close analysis and comparative writing. That’s more like it! And it gets better: the passages no longer look like a dog’s breakfast of colourful leaflets and Geography text books. What’s more, there are speeches – a TED Talk no less. This might be fun! The unseen ensures that skills are taught and the longer focus on the passage rewards diligent study and teaching properly. The rest of the paper is now designated as Transactional writing, with hopefully a clearer focus on the transactional nature of the writing, currently a little vague. It is also good to see a choice of question. For too long Creative writing in exams has been anything but. This seems to me to be a step in the right direction, which is continued into Paper 2. The two sections carry the same mark, making the Transactional writing a significant contribution to the whole: 30% of the oIGCSE mark on 1 question.The marking introduces a new AO, imaginatively called AO5 which can assess the quality of SPAG up to 12/30. Much clearer than the current allowance of “one third of the marks”
In paper 2, students are tested on the poetry/short story section of the anthology and more writing. I still find the poetry/short story idea rather clumsy and wonder what 3 of the 5 current stories did to deserve being thrown out! It is hard to complain about Tony Harrison (The bright lights of Sarajevo) and Maya Angelou (Still I rise) being included, though I wonder how many students will have already prepared the Susan Hill- maybe that’s the point. It still seems clumsy though, and I will offer the classes the exam rather than the coursework, if only to ensure broad coverage of the booklet. With no means of testing which passages have been read, the coursework option really does seem to dumb down the process of study in this paper.
The Creative section (Imaginative) is vastly improved. Not only a choice of three questions, but a picture stimulus too. The paper is now worth 40% of the whole – value for learning!
I do not understand the logic of removing Speaking and Listening from the IGCSE and the bolt on Presentation assessment seems useful, but carries no weight in terms of results. We now need to record a sample and ensure records are kept relating to that sample – 30 students form the cohort, with 10 each of pass, merit and distinction submitted. It all adds to the admin and to the time these things take.
Language Draft specification: International_GCSE_English_Language_A_draft_specification
Language Draft Sample assessment materials: International_GCSE_English_Language_A_draft_SAM
Language and Literature Draft Anthology: International_GCSE_Anthology_English_Language_A_and_English_Literature
Paper 1: Here things change. The 16 poems of anthology C, which always seemed to be a good advertisement for coursework, though “The Beast” – the 6 poem coursework task was ever unwieldly and complex, has now become the centre piece of paper 1 and cannot be relegated to coursework. Good. Not only that, but the poems will need to read as vehicles for comparison and there is a question based on an unseen poem. This is harder, yes, but so much more satisfactory if we wish students to become scholars of the genre, rather than the anthology group.
The paper links poetry with modern prose. OMAM is there, as is TKAM – I will opt for OMAM because it is short, yes, and needs to be taught in year 9 to begin with. But I will opt for OMAM because it is such a good text at this level. I have blogged about it often for this reason ( OMAM posts ) and still love teaching a text which so engages the hearts and minds of teenagers. The other texts are:
To Kill a Mockingbird: Harper Lee
Of Mice and Men”: John Steinbeck
The Whale Rider: Witi Ihimaera
The Joy Luck Club: Amy Tan and
Things Fall Apart: Chinua Achebe
In Paper 2 we have a choice between exam and coursework. Here I may well opt for the latter: I do think that the skills learned in terms of drafting and editing work are valuable and would be sorry to offer no coursework across the whole syllabus – it still exists at A level and the skill needs to be learned at some stage. This paper is Modern Drama and Literary Heritage. The latter sees a mix of drama and prose, though I am someone who feels that Shakespeare should be read at this stage, if only to allow a student to leave English having touched this greatest of all great writers in our language. The choice is nice, though hardly daring: Macbeth and R&J and the prose options – Austen (Pride), Dickens (Expectations) and The Scarlett Letter reflect a lack of imagination – a new syllabus should be a chance to explore the new rather than to recycle everything! The GCSE exam boards promoted Carol to GCSE level – daft. This board has simply taken the path of least discomfort by keeping Expectations. Pray God for Copperfield or Nickleby! ( Though I really want Hardy).
The modern drama is much more fun though:A View from the Bridge Arthur Miller
An Inspector Calls: J B Priestley
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night:-time Simon Stephens
Kindertransport: Diane Samuels
Death and the King’s Horseman: Wole Soyinka
This year it will be Priestley – because it is brilliant and it is never too early to make students think about our society and to become a little more aware of social responsibility. ( Inspector resources ) Who knows though. I fancy Kindertransport and once the new A levels have settled down…
Lit specification draft: International_GCSE_English_Literature_specification
Lit sample assessments: International_GCSE_English_Literature_SAM
So, all told, I think this has improved a course of which I was fond anyway. I wish there was more imagination in some areas and still heartily dislike the poetry/short story link. But much has improved, especially in Language paper 1 and Lit paper 1 now ensures due weight be given to the study of poetry. Yes.
I like this.
Oh, nearly forgot – it’s 1-9 grading, so no issues there….